129774133134531250_107"The extension of property tax from a technical perspective, there was no obstacle, some vested interests is the key obstacle. "--Jia Kang," pilot real estate taxes you should consider both stock and new incremental. Development of gradient policies. "--Yang Hongxu" only until date of the real estate tax is fully under way, and to play a role, is when the buy limit order to exit the market. ” —Again-Li Youhua property taxes "spread around" expose the slit. The State Council recently issued a notice, approval of national development and Reform Commission of the 2012 focus on deepening economic reform, make timely expansion of property tax in scope this year. Then, pilot expanding peri-urban speculation on property taxes the emergence, Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and other citiesThe list. On March 25, the Vice-Minister of Ministry of housing has denied Guangzhou property tax, then, Shenzhen is also excluded. For this, Jia Kang, Director, Institute of fiscal science
tera gold, Ministry says that promotion from a technical perspective, there was no obstacle to property taxes, some vested interests is the key obstacle. In addition, the experts suggested that the expansion of property tax pilot study of the surrounding amount and incremental and manpowerTaking into account, in the short term, the tax is difficult to replace "quota" policy. Amount and incremental overall consideration to widespread speculation in the industry, Guangdong, Shenzhen, and two or three cities become the pilot more likely. As to whether Beijing will become a pilot, Jia Kang, analysis, the biggest difficulty is how to "take care of" vested interests concerned. In Beijing, for example, launched in Beijing real estate tax will beVery difficult. Property rights of hundreds of thousands of small rooms in Beijing and other "Central delivery suite", you will need a secure solution, it will be a difficult issue. Property taxes the pilot is also controversial. Yang Hongxu in the international financial reporters, "on the whole, the final solution is a collection of stock. But because it is the pilot, scope of mayNarrow, should be charged to Delta, combine stock, luxury can be a small amount, but eventually make the first suite of demand, exempt as far as possible, for second homes can be reduced. "" At present large amount of new housing, but along with the demographic dividend, slowing aging, housing demand and other factors change, stock entered after 15 to 20 times. This is notTrend that can be reversed. "Asia Pacific commercial real estate Dean Zhu lingbo yesterday in an interview with the international financial newspaper reporter suggested that the" pilot real estate taxes you should consider both stock and new incremental, in accordance with the trend of the gradient transform, develop policy gradient. "He called for property taxes cannot be similar to the pilot as a short-term" restriction "springs, such as policy, there should be a periodicThoughts, future development goals and match to form long-term, rational stereo system. "Purchase order" property taxes to exit without time, buy limit order do? Experts explained that the purpose of both policies is inconsistent, but the policy is the same. Property tax is intended to improve the tax system as a starting point, while the buy limit order was directly suppress property speculation. Therefore real estateTax the practical implementation of the initiative is not very clear
tera gold, but all the signs, real estate tax reform push "rxw" promotion is just a matter of time. Many experts believe that as a long-term policy
tera power leveling, property taxes contribute to regulation of normal, limit exit planted foreshadowing of the purchase order. Liwuwei, Vice Chairman of the CPPCC, said, "we want to strengthen the design of property tax,By restriction is not, in the short term. If the establishment of a tax system, real estate regulation more flexible, because better rate adjustment, restriction of it's more difficult to adjust. "Jia Kang, also believe that unique prescription of property taxes is not to resolve the problem, but it is the end of the current administrative control means a condition of real estate. In fact, from anAnhui Wuhu "market new deal" to relax in disguise in Shanghai "restriction order", and even for some time in the past, national, including Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Chongqing, 17 cities announced a different tune policy, restriction of policies often encounter challenges. However, Yang Hongxu said, despite the restriction is not a policy for a long time, but on the premise of tax effect is not obvious, restriction of the politicalStrategy as a means of transition, are still difficult to replace in the short term. Worthy of note is that although the high-end real estate of Chongqing and Shanghai in the past, there was a decline in trading volumes, prices stabilized, but the industry generally believe that mainly by a variety of factors such as restriction, limited credit overlay form, it is difficult to judge the role of real estate tax. Yang Hongxu pointed out that, since real estateTax is currently in a pilot period, its level of taxed and levied are small, policy clearly enough, so the role of the real estate market is more limited. Is based on the current constraints, Jimei University Real Estate Institute Director Li Youhua noted that, only until date of the real estate tax is fully under way, and to play a role, is when the buy limit order from the market。 。 Statement: SINA posted this article for the purpose of passing more information, does not mean to endorse their views or confirm the description.
Others:
没有评论:
发表评论