129756355706875000_9Gossip in spite of opposition from many, also is the official hair dryer and continuing: "more or less imposed congestion charge", even civil supporters. During the national people's Congress session, academician Zhong Nanshan press says: "receive traffic congestion charge is a kind of administrative intervention in the long run is effective for alleviating traffic congestion and reduce pollution". Zhong Nanshan is the medical professionExpert, is the urban outsider, he castigates neither perfection, nor in dead earnest. Bell academicians of the congestion charge, and no disadvantages of the congestion charge. Have economists said that traffic congestion is the symbol of economic prosperity, which, of course, is nonsense, because congestion insufficient supply of municipal roads. However, as a jam "urban disease", is not an objective, rather than holdingBlocking is "urban life". Jam city, it reflected the high utilization of municipal roads. Unless the city state country of small country with few people
diablo 3 gold, almost no congestion in big cities of the country. Commodity prices is the consumer has to pay the price, are members of the public have to bear the costs of traffic congestion. Guidelines like commodity prices as commodity production, traffic jam play effect of urban construction Guide.Jam was not welfare but costs, congestion caused by the pressure of public opinion is to drive the dynamics of urban development. Congestion charge rule of not blocking, if he diluted under high congestion charge to road-Canton, but bad, city builders of our open your eyes become blind, urbanization was resistance. Who claims that said person should use economic means to control traffic congestion, only knows how to constrain consumption, but do not know how to stimulate production.Commodity prices on producer incentives, traffic congestion costs are clearly negative incentive, the Government does not engage in urban construction, congestion charges more. And our Government other than dictated by money, not subject to other conditions. Once the congestion charge is imposed, it will impede the urban construction of "vested interests". The incumbent "vested interest" has been painful, do not addPain factor. Assume that environmental protection is the only standard, then the city should not exist. Country life lamination of human nature, but why in modern times, regardless of country
tera gold, culture and race, rush towards urbanization? Since city venture capital facilities, and more job opportunities. Economists say, population density living, reduced transaction costs. Urbanization process is not a one-way flow, but bi-directionalCircular
tera power leveling, country people flocked to the city for seeking wealth, city map comfortable and to avoid the country. Best is the free movement of nationals between the urban and rural areas, natural evolution of society, like the United States. Ruling the country by personal preference is dangerous, forced the city to create the rural atmosphere of the high social cost of infinite. China experienced a constraint counter urbanization movement, unique for dozens ofYears to maintain urban traffic jam, but it wasn't a paradise on Earth. After the reform and opening up, turn on the urbanization process, hindering the system of household registration system, land of urbanization has not been abolished, which is conducive to the protection of urban traffic flow, with Chinese characteristics. The congestion charge is a not widely accepted overseas "diabolic tricks and wicked craft", said fans of the congestion charge "be subservient to foreigners" is notMin. Has the means to show the world was experiencing congestion of City selling household registration system and land system with Chinese characteristics. More than thought
没有评论:
发表评论